|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Adreno 330. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC is quad-core (Krait 400) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the chips are in games Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 801 MSM8974AC | 3% |
Kirin 658 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC | 19% |
Kirin 658 | 52% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 801 MSM8974AC | 1% |
Kirin 658 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC |
Kirin 658 | Total score | 47809 | 57552 | CPU | 13387 | 16117 | GPU | 18163 | 21865 | MEM | 7650 | 9207 | UX | 8603 | 10368 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC |
Kirin 658 | Single-Core | 127 | 148 | Multi-Core | 584 | 670 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC |
Kirin 658 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz Krait 400 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 28 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC is 16% better than Kirin 658 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC has 4 more core than Kirin 658. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 330 | Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 578 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 166.46 | 61.2 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 128 | | Display | 2560 x 2048 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 15.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 39.9 | 12.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.6 | 20.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 23.9 | 12.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 33.3 | 9.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 50.6 | 12.4 | Real Racing 3 | 33.3 | 25.1 | Sniper 3D | 34.6 | 44.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 42.6 | 24.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 30.6 | 29.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 31.9 | 28.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 28 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X4 LTE modem | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC is better: 17
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 24 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC and Kirin 658, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|