|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7870 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Geekbench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7870 or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 7 Octa 7870 | 3% |
Kirin 658 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 7 Octa 7870 | 55% |
Kirin 658 | 52% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 7 Octa 7870 | 1% |
Kirin 658 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 7 Octa 7870 |
Kirin 658 | Total score | 45099 | 57552 | CPU | 12626 | 16117 | GPU | 17146 | 21865 | MEM | 7211 | 9207 | UX | 8115 | 10368 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 7 Octa 7870 |
Kirin 658 | Single-Core | 119 | 148 | Multi-Core | 551 | 670 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 7 Octa 7870 |
Kirin 658 | Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1650 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 28 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 64 KB | L2 cache | | 4 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 23% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7870 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T830 MP2 | Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 47.6 | 61.2 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 13.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 36.2 | 12.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 24.2 | 20.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 21.9 | 12.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 30.1 | 9.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 46.9 | 12.4 | Real Racing 3 | 48.4 | 25.1 | Sniper 3D | 46 | 44.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 43.6 | 24.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 27.8 | 29.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 29 | 28.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.6 2CA | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 7 Octa 7870 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|