Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7870 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Geekbench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7870 or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

 
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
HiSilicon Kirin 658

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 7 Octa 78703% Kirin 6584%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 7 Octa 787055% Kirin 65852%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 7 Octa 78701% Kirin 6583%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 7 Octa 7870 Kirin 658
Total score4509957552
CPU1262616117
GPU1714621865
MEM72119207
UX811510368

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 7 Octa 7870 Kirin 658
Single-Core119148
Multi-Core551670

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 7 Octa 7870 Kirin 658
Frequency1600 MHz2100 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)3 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3x
Max. Memory4 Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency1650933
Memory bandwidth14.928
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache64 KB
L2 cache4 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 23% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7870 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T830 MP2Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency700 MHz900 MHz
GFloPS47.661.2
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1200 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile13.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)36.212.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra24.220.1
Call of Duty: Mobile21.912.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)30.19.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition46.912.4
Real Racing 348.425.1
Sniper 3D4644.2
Need for Speed No Limits43.624.1
Mortal Kombat X27.829.1
CSR Racing 22928.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.6 2CA
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 18
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 7 Octa 7870 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


Exynos 7 Octa 7870 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E


Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands