Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Allwinner A133 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 benchmark which processor is better

Allwinner A133 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T830 MP3 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Octane V2, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy A133 or Exynos 7 Octa 7880 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

 
Allwinner A133
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
A1334% Exynos 7 Octa 78804%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
A13367% Exynos 7 Octa 788057%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
A1333% Exynos 7 Octa 78802%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
A133 Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Total score6306060634
CPU1764916971
GPU2396223044
MEM100889701
UX1135310913

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
A133 Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Single-Core102156
Multi-Core341706

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
A133 Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Frequency1600 MHz1900 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A538x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)6 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4LPDDR4
Max. MemoryDDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz1866
Memory bandwidth616.5
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is 15% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 7880. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GE8300Mali-T830 MP3
GPU Frequency660 MHz950 MHz
GFloPS128.7571.4
# of Cores23
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.310.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra23.419.5
Call of Duty: Mobile15.511.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)11.57.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition15.511.3
Real Racing 346.829.3
Sniper 3D30.442.9
Need for Speed No Limits37.431.2
Mortal Kombat X33.928.3
CSR Racing 228.125.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP21.7 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.7 3CA
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.100 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Exynos 7 Octa 7880 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


A133 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


Exynos 7 Octa 7880 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands