HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek MT6750, comparison of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Mali-T860 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chips in Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Kirin 658 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 658

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 658

52%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 658

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 658	MT6750
Total score	57552	40481
CPU	16117	11332
GPU	21865	15386
MEM	9207	6480
UX	10368	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 658	MT6750
Single-Core	148	107
Multi-Core	670	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 658	MT6750
Frequency	2100 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	667
Memory bandwidth	28	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	64 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	4 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 28% better than MT6750 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T830 MP2	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	61.2	35.3
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	12.2	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	20.1	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	12.1	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	9.7	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	12.4	41.3
Real Racing 3	25.1	37.1
Sniper 3D	44.2	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	24.1	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	29.1	30.7
CSR Racing 2	28.1	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 10
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 658 and MT6750, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 658 specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.