Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Rockchip RK3566 vs Allwinner A133, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or A133.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
A133 | 15% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
A133 | 60% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
A133 | 12% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
A133 | | Total score | 64108 | 63060 | | CPU | 5870 | 16458 | | GPU | 6458 | 14220 | | MEM | 3517 | 10738 | | UX | 2943 | 9491 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
A133 | | Single-Core | 168 | 102 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 341 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
A133 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 6 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3566 is 19% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | PowerVR GE8300 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 660 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 128.75 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 14.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 23.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 15.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 11.5 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 15.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 46.8 | | Sniper 3D | | 30.4 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 37.4 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 33.9 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 28.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 19
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
|
