Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8550 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8550

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8550, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell).
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom x5-Z8550 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as PCMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, Neocore, Octane V2, Vellamo, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the processors are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 658 or Atom x5-Z8550 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Intel Atom x5-Z8550

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 6584% Atom x5-Z85505%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 65852% Atom x5-Z855056%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 6583% Atom x5-Z85502%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 658 Atom x5-Z8550
Total score5755273756
CPU1611720655
GPU2186528035
MEM920711795
UX1036813276

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 658 Atom x5-Z8550
Single-Core148190
Multi-Core670859

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 658 Atom x5-Z8550
Frequency2100 MHz1440 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography16 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.44-2.4 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3xLPDDR3
Max. Memory6 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency9331600
Memory bandwidth2824
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 31% better than Atom x5-Z8550 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 658 has -4 more core than Atom x5-Z8550. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T830 MP2Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
GPU Frequency900 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS61.2134
# of Cores216
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)12.216.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra20.127.7
Call of Duty: Mobile12.118.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)9.713.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition12.417.8
Real Racing 325.155.4
Sniper 3D44.244.3
Need for Speed No Limits24.149.9
Mortal Kombat X29.144.3
CSR Racing 228.136
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.21 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.6 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8550 is better: 26
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Kirin 658 and Atom x5-Z8550, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
Atom x5-Z8550 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290


Atom x5-Z8550 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands