Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro), comparison of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy A133 or Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A133

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A133

67%

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A133

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A133	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
Total score	63060	54931
CPU	17649	15371
GPU	23962	20866
MEM	10088	8786
UX	11353	9887

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A133	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
Single-Core	102	142
Multi-Core	341	639

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A133	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
Frequency	1600 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.2GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz	933
Memory bandwidth	6	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is 27% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	54.31
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		18.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	14.3	46.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	32.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	28.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	11.5	38.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.5	58.7
Real Racing 3	46.8	56.4
Sniper 3D	30.4	41.9
Need for Speed No Limits	37.4	38.6
Mortal Kombat X	33.9	37
CSR Racing 2	28.1	35.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	21 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is better: 23
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips A133 and Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro), as well as read the test results at the links below.

A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• A133 specs and review.

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) specs and review.