Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7580 or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Kirin 658

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

25%

Kirin 658

52%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Kirin 658

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Octa 7580	Kirin 658
Total score	43687	57552
CPU	12230	16117
GPU	16597	21865
MEM	6985	9207
UX	7870	10368

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Octa 7580	Kirin 658
Single-Core	116	148
Multi-Core	534	670

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Octa 7580	Kirin 658
Frequency	1600 MHz	2100 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	1650	933
Memory bandwidth	7	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	4 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 23% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7580 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	61.2
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1200 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	13.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	35.8	12.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	20.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.1	12.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	29.8	9.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	44.7	12.4
Real Racing 3	46.8	25.1
Sniper 3D	44.5	44.2
Need for Speed No Limits	32.8	24.1
Mortal Kombat X	33.9	29.1
CSR Racing 2	25.7	28.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE Cat.6 2CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 18
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Exynos 7 Octa 7580 and Kirin 658, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 7 Octa 7580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 7580 specs and review.

Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 658 specs and review.