|
HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Adreno 506. This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 450 SDM450 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 658 or Snapdragon 450 SDM450 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 658 | 4% |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 658 | 52% |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | 57% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 658 | 3% |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | 2% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | Total score | 57552 | 61183 | CPU | 16117 | 17140 | GPU | 21865 | 23248 | MEM | 9207 | 9791 | UX | 10368 | 11013 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | Single-Core | 148 | 203 | Multi-Core | 670 | 712 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 | Frequency | 2100 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.48GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 7.46 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 14% better than Snapdragon 450 SDM450 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T830 MP2 | Adreno 506 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 61.2 | 130 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 96 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 12.2 | 11.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 20.1 | 20.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 12.1 | 12.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 9.7 | 8.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 12.4 | 12.6 | Real Racing 3 | 25.1 | 30.6 | Sniper 3D | 44.2 | 26.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 24.1 | 32.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.1 | 26.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.1 | 28.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X9 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 100 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 is better: 23 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Snapdragon 450 SDM450 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|