|
MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Allwinner A133 |
|
Comparisons 07-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Allwinner A133, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MediaTek MT6762VCB or A133.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT6762VCB | 5% |
A133 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT6762VCB | 68% |
A133 | 67% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT6762VCB | 3% |
A133 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A133 | Total score | 77776 | 63060 | CPU | 21776 | 17649 | GPU | 29561 | 23962 | MEM | 12450 | 10088 | UX | 13989 | 11353 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A133 | Single-Core | 201 | 102 | Multi-Core | 905 | 341 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A133 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek MT6762VCB is 19% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MediaTek MT6762VCB has -4 more core than A133. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8300 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 660 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 128.75 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.7 | 14.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.4 | 23.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.6 | 15.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.8 | 11.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.3 | 15.5 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 46.8 | Sniper 3D | 34.1 | 30.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.6 | 37.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.6 | 33.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.8 | 28.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6762VCB is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 12 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek MT6762VCB SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
A133 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
| |
|