|
HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD), comparison of GPUs Mali-T880 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Quadrant, AnTuTu, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 658 or Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 658 | 4% |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 658 | 52% |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 50% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 658 | 3% |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 658 |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | Total score | 57552 | 59865 | CPU | 16117 | 16766 | GPU | 21865 | 22743 | MEM | 9207 | 9582 | UX | 10368 | 10779 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 658 |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | Single-Core | 148 | 154 | Multi-Core | 670 | 697 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 658 |
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | Frequency | 2100 MHz | 2390 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.39 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB | Memory Frequency | 933 | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 64 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is 12% better than Kirin 658 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T830 MP2 | Mali-T880 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 61.2 | 68 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 12.2 | 11.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 20.1 | 20.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 12.1 | 12.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 9.7 | 8.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 12.4 | 12.3 | Real Racing 3 | 25.1 | 31.4 | Sniper 3D | 44.2 | 46 | Need for Speed No Limits | 24.1 | 33.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.1 | 24 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.1 | 27.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is better: 16 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36
| |
|