Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 505 and Mali-T830 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 429 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 658 or Snapdragon 429 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 6584% Snapdragon 4294%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 65852% Snapdragon 42964%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 6583% Snapdragon 4292%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 658 Snapdragon 429
Total score5755265308
CPU1611718278
GPU2186524823
MEM920710456
UX1036811762

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 658 Snapdragon 429
Single-Core148169
Multi-Core670760

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 658 Snapdragon 429
Frequency2100 MHz2000 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography16 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)5 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR3xLPDDR3
Max. Memory6 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency933800
Memory bandwidth286.4
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache64 KB
L2 cache4 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 4% better than Snapdragon 429 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 658 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 429. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T830 MP2Adreno 505
GPU Frequency900 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS61.248
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units48
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)12.214.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra20.123.7
Call of Duty: Mobile12.116.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)9.711.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition12.415.6
Real Racing 325.147.4
Sniper 3D44.230.8
Need for Speed No Limits24.133.2
Mortal Kombat X29.127.3
CSR Racing 228.130.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X6 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.75 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 is better: 17
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
Snapdragon 429 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290


Snapdragon 429 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands