Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek MT6595

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek MT6595, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and PowerVR G6200.

This performance comparison includes two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy A133 or MT6595 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A133

MT6595

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A133

67%

MT6595

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A133

MT6595

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A133	MT6595
Total score	63060	50568
CPU	17649	14157
GPU	23962	19211
MEM	10088	8090
UX	11353	9092

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A133	MT6595
Single-Core	102	130
Multi-Core	341	589

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A133	MT6595
Frequency	1600 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz	667
Memory bandwidth	6	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 27% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than MT6595. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	PowerVR G6200
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	76.8
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		16.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	14.3	42.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	28.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	25.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	11.5	35.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.5	53.7
Real Racing 3	46.8	49.5
Sniper 3D	30.4	53.8
Need for Speed No Limits	37.4	50.9
Mortal Kombat X	33.9	45.3
CSR Racing 2	28.1	31.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	20 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips A133 and MT6595, as well as read the test results at the links below.

A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• A133 specs and review.

MT6595 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6595 specs and review.