Spreadtrum SC9830 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Spreadtrum SC9830 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, and how good the processors are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Spreadtrum SC9830 or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Spreadtrum SC9830

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Spreadtrum SC9830

28%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Spreadtrum SC9830

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Spreadtrum SC9830	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	11013	22019
CPU	3083	6174
GPU	4193	8364
MEM	1752	3526
UX	1981	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Spreadtrum SC9830	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	29	58
Multi-Core	134	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Spreadtrum SC9830	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1200 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	1 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 7% better than Spreadtrum SC9830 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	8.4	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.6	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.7	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.9	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.9	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.2	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.7	20.1
Real Racing 3	4.9	11.8
Sniper 3D	6.2	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	6.2	15
Mortal Kombat X	6.2	15
CSR Racing 2	5.1	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 30
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Spreadtrum SC9830 specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.