Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC7731 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC7731

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC7731, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC7731 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or Spreadtrum SC7731 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

 
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Spreadtrum SC7731

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 3 Quad 34751% Spreadtrum SC77311%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 3 Quad 347526% Spreadtrum SC773124%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 3 Quad 34751% Spreadtrum SC77311%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 Spreadtrum SC7731
Total score2201918087
CPU61745057
GPU83646864
MEM35262896
UX39563255

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 Spreadtrum SC7731
Single-Core5848
Multi-Core269221

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 Spreadtrum SC7731
Frequency1300 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)4 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR2
Max. Memory3 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency800266
Memory bandwidth74
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720 MP2Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency600 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS20.48.4
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile3.84.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)15.813.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra9.48.8
Call of Duty: Mobile8.37.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)12.911.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition20.117.6
Real Racing 311.817.6
Sniper 3D17.911.4
Need for Speed No Limits1515.8
Mortal Kombat X1511.4
CSR Racing 212.212.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemTD-SCDMA/GGE
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC7731 is better: 6
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and Spreadtrum SC7731, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC7731 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A


Spreadtrum SC7731 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands