Intel Atom x3-C3130 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom x3-C3130 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Atom x3-C3130 or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Atom x3-C3130

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Atom x3-C3130

26%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Atom x3-C3130

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Atom x3-C3130	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	15909	22019
CPU	4444	6174
GPU	6045	8364
MEM	2544	3526
UX	2873	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Atom x3-C3130	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	42	58
Multi-Core	194	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Atom x3-C3130	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.0 GHz SoFIA	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	1 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 23% better than Atom x3-C3130 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom x3-C3130 has 2 more core than Exynos 3 Quad 3475. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	10.8	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.6	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	13.2	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	8.1	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	7.4	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.6	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	16.3	20.1
Real Racing 3	12.2	11.8
Sniper 3D	17.8	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	13	15
Mortal Kombat X	9.3	15
CSR Racing 2	8.9	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	A-GOLD 620
Download speed	21 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 27
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Atom x3-C3130 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3130 specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.