|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 vs Spreadtrum SC9830 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 vs Spreadtrum SC9830, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 304 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 or Spreadtrum SC9830 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 26% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Total score | 17276 | 11013 | CPU | 4846 | 3083 | GPU | 6572 | 4193 | MEM | 2754 | 1752 | UX | 3104 | 1981 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Single-Core | 45 | 29 | Multi-Core | 211 | 134 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR 2/3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 533 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is 4% better than Spreadtrum SC9830 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 304 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 19.2 | 8.4 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 24 | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 4.6 | 1.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 13.2 | 7.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 7.5 | 3.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 7.9 | 3.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.6 | 5.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 16.8 | 9.7 | Real Racing 3 | 15 | 4.9 | Sniper 3D | 12 | 6.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 12 | 6.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 8.6 | 6.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 8.3 | 5.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 and Spreadtrum SC9830, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|