MediaTek MT8167D vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8167D vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MT8167D or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8167D

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8167D

28%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8167D

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8167D	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	24936	22019
CPU	6992	6174
GPU	9483	8364
MEM	3995	3526
UX	4495	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8167D	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	66	58
Multi-Core	304	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8167D	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.5	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.9	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.1	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.6	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.6	20.1
Real Racing 3	13.6	11.8
Sniper 3D	14.2	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	13.1	15
Mortal Kombat X	15.8	15
CSR Racing 2	14.2	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 12
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.