|
Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6572 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6572, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6572 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Spreadtrum SC9830 or MT6572 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSpreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
MT6572 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Spreadtrum SC9830 | 28% |
MT6572 | 22% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSpreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
MT6572 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6572 | Total score | 11013 | 13149 | CPU | 3083 | 3687 | GPU | 4193 | 4987 | MEM | 1752 | 2094 | UX | 1981 | 2366 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6572 | Single-Core | 29 | 34 | Multi-Core | 134 | 160 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6572 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Spreadtrum SC9830 has -2 more core than MT6572. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP2 | Mali-400 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 8.4 | 4.5 | # of Cores | 2 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 960 x 540 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 1.6 | 3.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 7.7 | 9.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 3.9 | 5.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 3.9 | 4.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 5.2 | 7.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 9.7 | 12.1 | Real Racing 3 | 4.9 | 7.1 | Sniper 3D | 6.2 | 12.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 6.2 | 8 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.2 | 7.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 5.1 | 6.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 5 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | HD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | | | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6572 is better: 20 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Spreadtrum SC9830 and MT6572, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
MT6572 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|