Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6592M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6592M, speed testing of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6592M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or MT6592M and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6592M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

MT6592M

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6592M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6592M
Total score	22019	28065
CPU	6174	7858
GPU	8364	10654
MEM	3526	4496
UX	3956	5046

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6592M
Single-Core	58	74
Multi-Core	269	343

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6592M
Frequency	1300 MHz	1400 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	667
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6592M is 7% better than Exynos 3 Quad 3475 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 3 Quad 3475 has 4 more core than MT6592M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	35.77
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	8.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	22.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	14.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	14.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	18.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	28.3
Real Racing 3	11.8	21.2
Sniper 3D	17.9	18.3
Need for Speed No Limits	15	22.6
Mortal Kombat X	15	16.2
CSR Racing 2	12.2	16.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6592M is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and MT6592M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

MT6592M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6592M specs and review.