MediaTek MT6732M vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6732M vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T760 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6732M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT6732M or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6732M

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6732M

24%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6732M

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6732M	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	27277	22019
CPU	7632	6174
GPU	10363	8364
MEM	4359	3526
UX	4909	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6732M	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	72	58
Multi-Core	333	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6732M	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6732M has -4 more core than Exynos 3 Quad 3475. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	34	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	7.6	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.6	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	13.1	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	13.4	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	17.7	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	27.5	20.1
Real Racing 3	22.9	11.8
Sniper 3D	28.8	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	21	15
Mortal Kombat X	17	15
CSR Racing 2	15.7	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732M is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6732M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6732M specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.