|
Intel Atom Z2520 vs Spreadtrum SC9830 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom Z2520 vs Spreadtrum SC9830, compare of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Atom Z2520 or Spreadtrum SC9830 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom Z2520 | 14% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z2520 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Total score | 11918 | 11013 | CPU | 3335 | 3083 | GPU | 4536 | 4193 | MEM | 1906 | 1752 | UX | 2154 | 1981 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z2520 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Single-Core | 31 | 29 | Multi-Core | 145 | 134 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z2520 |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.2 GHz Cloverview | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Atom Z2520 has 2 more core than Spreadtrum SC9830. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX544 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 533 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 17.06 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.2 | 1.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 9.8 | 7.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 5.3 | 3.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 5.9 | 3.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 7.7 | 5.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 11.5 | 9.7 | Real Racing 3 | 9.3 | 4.9 | Sniper 3D | 10.1 | 6.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 9.5 | 6.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.9 | 6.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 6.9 | 5.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Atom Z2520 and Spreadtrum SC9830, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|