Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP4 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3470 or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

 
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 3 Quad 34701% Exynos 3 Quad 34751%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 3 Quad 347026% Exynos 3 Quad 347526%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 3 Quad 34701% Exynos 3 Quad 34751%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score1810922019
CPU50796174
GPU68898364
MEM28973526
UX32553956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core4858
Multi-Core221269

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency1400 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)4 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3
Max. Memory3 Gb3 Gb
Memory Frequency800800
Memory bandwidth77
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is 7% better than Exynos 3 Quad 3475 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP4Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency450 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS16.220.4
# of Cores42
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.13.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.615.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra9.79.4
Call of Duty: Mobile8.98.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)12.112.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition18.620.1
Real Racing 314.611.8
Sniper 3D15.517.9
Need for Speed No Limits13.615
Mortal Kombat X11.215
CSR Racing 212.612.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.4
Download speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands