|
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC7731C |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC7731C, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC7731C is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of chips in Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or Spreadtrum SC7731C and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 3 Quad 3475 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 3 Quad 3475 | 26% |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | 24% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 3 Quad 3475 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 3 Quad 3475 |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | Total score | 22019 | 17486 | CPU | 6174 | 4893 | GPU | 8364 | 6638 | MEM | 3526 | 2796 | UX | 3956 | 3152 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 3 Quad 3475 |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | Single-Core | 58 | 46 | Multi-Core | 269 | 213 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 3 Quad 3475 |
Spreadtrum SC7731C | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 7 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 7% better than Spreadtrum SC7731C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 20.4 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.8 | 3.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 15.8 | 12.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 9.4 | 7.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 8.3 | 6.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.9 | 10.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.1 | 16.5 | Real Racing 3 | 11.8 | 9.1 | Sniper 3D | 17.9 | 13.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 15 | 13.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 15 | 8.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 12.2 | 8.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | TD-SCDMA/GGE | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC7731C is better: 2 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and Spreadtrum SC7731C, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Spreadtrum SC7731C SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|