Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC9850

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Spreadtrum SC9850, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T820.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9850 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, Neocore, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or Spreadtrum SC9850 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Spreadtrum SC9850

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Spreadtrum SC9850

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Spreadtrum SC9850

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Spreadtrum SC9850
Total score	22019	25610
CPU	6174	7162
GPU	8364	9729
MEM	3526	4093
UX	3956	4607

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Spreadtrum SC9850
Single-Core	58	68
Multi-Core	269	313

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Spreadtrum SC9850
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	266
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T820
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	10.2
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1440 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	2.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	16.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	8.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	12.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	22.5
Real Racing 3	11.8	17.2
Sniper 3D	17.9	13.8
Need for Speed No Limits	15	15.5
Mortal Kombat X	15	13.8
CSR Racing 2	12.2	11.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9850 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Spreadtrum SC9850 specs and review.