Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT8163

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT8163, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT8163 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the CPUs are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or MT8163 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT8163

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

MT8163

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT8163

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT8163
Total score	22019	33420
CPU	6174	9348
GPU	8364	12697
MEM	3526	5343
UX	3956	6016

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT8163
Single-Core	58	88
Multi-Core	269	408

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT8163
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	667
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	17.68
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	9.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	26.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	17.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	15.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	21.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	33.3
Real Racing 3	11.8	26.9
Sniper 3D	17.9	23.3
Need for Speed No Limits	15	32.2
Mortal Kombat X	15	20.6
CSR Racing 2	12.2	25.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8163 is better: 22
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and MT8163, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

MT8163 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT8163 specs and review.