MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC9830

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC9830, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR SGX531 and Mali-400 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as 3DMark, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6575 or Spreadtrum SC9830 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

Spreadtrum SC9830

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

Spreadtrum SC9830

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

Spreadtrum SC9830

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	Spreadtrum SC9830
Total score	10235	11013
CPU	2875	3083
GPU	3891	4193
MEM	1627	1752
UX	1834	1981

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	Spreadtrum SC9830
Single-Core	27	29
Multi-Core	125	134

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	Spreadtrum SC9830
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	1	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9830 is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Spreadtrum SC9830. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	1.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	7.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	3.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	3.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	5.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	9.7
Real Racing 3	7.2	4.9
Sniper 3D	5.8	6.2
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	6.2
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	6.2
CSR Racing 2	4.7	5.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 26
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6575 and Spreadtrum SC9830, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Spreadtrum SC9830 specs and review.