|
Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6570 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6570, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6570 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Spreadtrum SC9830 or MT6570 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSpreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
MT6570 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Spreadtrum SC9830 | 28% |
MT6570 | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSpreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
MT6570 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6570 | Total score | 11013 | 12348 | CPU | 3083 | 3448 | GPU | 4193 | 4692 | MEM | 1752 | 1983 | UX | 1981 | 2214 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6570 | Single-Core | 29 | 32 | Multi-Core | 134 | 150 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Spreadtrum SC9830 |
MT6570 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Spreadtrum SC9830 has -2 more core than MT6570. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP2 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 8.4 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 960 x 540 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 1.6 | 3.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 7.7 | 10.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 3.9 | 6.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 3.9 | 5.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 5.2 | 7.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 9.7 | 12.3 | Real Racing 3 | 4.9 | 9.8 | Sniper 3D | 6.2 | 14.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 6.2 | 11.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.2 | 7.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 5.1 | 9.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 5 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | HD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | | | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6570 is better: 19 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Spreadtrum SC9830 and MT6570, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
MT6570 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|