Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6737V

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6737V, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6737V is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or MT6737V and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6737V

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

MT6737V

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6737V

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6737V
Total score	22019	26522
CPU	6174	7426
GPU	8364	10086
MEM	3526	4242
UX	3956	4775

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6737V
Single-Core	58	70
Multi-Core	269	324

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6737V
Frequency	1300 MHz	1250 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	640
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 3% better than MT6737V in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	5.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	19.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	11.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	11.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	15.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	25.2
Real Racing 3	11.8	14.6
Sniper 3D	17.9	22.2
Need for Speed No Limits	15	21.1
Mortal Kombat X	15	18.7
CSR Racing 2	12.2	12.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737V is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

MT6737V SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737V specs and review.