MediaTek MT8735W vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8735W vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8735W is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Octane V2, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MT8735W or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8735W

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8735W

26%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8735W

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8735W	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	23460	22019
CPU	6565	6174
GPU	8914	8364
MEM	3746	3526
UX	4222	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8735W	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	62	58
Multi-Core	286	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8735W	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.9	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	11.7	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.5	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.1	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	22.1	20.1
Real Racing 3	14.6	11.8
Sniper 3D	25.7	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	18.7	15
Mortal Kombat X	17	15
CSR Racing 2	15.2	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735W is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8735W SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8735W specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.