Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6735

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs MediaTek MT6735, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like PCMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or MT6735 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6735

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

MT6735

23%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

MT6735

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6735
Total score	22019	27900
CPU	6174	7813
GPU	8364	10597
MEM	3526	4470
UX	3956	5027

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6735
Single-Core	58	74
Multi-Core	269	341

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	MT6735
Frequency	1300 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	667
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6735 is 13% better than Exynos 3 Quad 3475 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	7.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	21.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	13.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	13.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	17.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	27.4
Real Racing 3	11.8	20.9
Sniper 3D	17.9	26.4
Need for Speed No Limits	15	25
Mortal Kombat X	15	22.2
CSR Racing 2	12.2	16.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735 is better: 23
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and MT6735, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

MT6735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735 specs and review.