Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6572M benchmark which processor is better

Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6572M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Spreadtrum SC9830 vs MediaTek MT6572M, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6572M is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Vellamo, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Spreadtrum SC9830 or MT6572M and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

 
Spreadtrum SC9830
MediaTek MT6572M

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Spreadtrum SC98301% MT6572M1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Spreadtrum SC983028% MT6572M22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Spreadtrum SC98301% MT6572M1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Spreadtrum SC9830 MT6572M
Total score1101311264
CPU30833147
GPU41934274
MEM17521793
UX19812027

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Spreadtrum SC9830 MT6572M
Single-Core2929
Multi-Core134137

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Spreadtrum SC9830 MT6572M
Frequency1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores42
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A72x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory1 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency266266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9830 is 16% better than MT6572M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Spreadtrum SC9830 has -2 more core than MT6572M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP2Mali-400
GPU Frequency400 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS8.44.5
# of Cores21
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels960 x 540 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile1.62.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)7.78.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra3.94.1
Call of Duty: Mobile3.94.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)5.26.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition9.710.4
Real Racing 34.98.2
Sniper 3D6.27.8
Need for Speed No Limits6.27.4
Mortal Kombat X6.24.7
CSR Racing 25.14.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Upload speed
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6572M is better: 17
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Spreadtrum SC9830 and MT6572M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
MT6572M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10


Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E


MT6572M SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands