Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Adreno 203.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A5) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Octane V2, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, and how good the chipsets are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

-54%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	17324	22019
CPU	4859	6174
GPU	6585	8364
MEM	2774	3526
UX	3128	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	60	58
Multi-Core	211	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	1	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A5	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	333	800
Memory bandwidth	6	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 23% better than Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 has 3 more core than Exynos 3 Quad 3475. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 203	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	245 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	7.8	20.4
# of Cores		2
# of Shader Units	16
Display	854 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	4.5	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	13.2	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	7.4	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	7.2	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.4	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	16.6	20.1
Real Racing 3	9.3	11.8
Sniper 3D	11.8	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	10.4	15
Mortal Kombat X	9.6	15
CSR Racing 2	8.9	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 34
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 and Exynos 3 Quad 3475, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.