MediaTek MT8765B vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8765B vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, and how good the chips are in games Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MT8765B or Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Total score	26283	22019
CPU	7350	6174
GPU	9989	8364
MEM	4212	3526
UX	4721	3956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Single-Core	69	58
Multi-Core	321	269

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	Exynos 3 Quad 3475
Frequency	1280 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 1% better than MT8765B in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	15.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	9.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	8.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	12.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	20.1
Real Racing 3	17.2	11.8
Sniper 3D	15.7	17.9
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	15
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	15
CSR Racing 2	10.8	12.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 11
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.