|
MediaTek MT6582M vs Spreadtrum SC9830 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6582M vs Spreadtrum SC9830, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6582M is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9830 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MT6582M or Spreadtrum SC9830 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6582M | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6582M | 24% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6582M | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6582M |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Total score | 20216 | 11013 | CPU | 5655 | 3083 | GPU | 7673 | 4193 | MEM | 3234 | 1752 | UX | 3633 | 1981 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6582M |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Single-Core | 53 | 29 | Multi-Core | 247 | 134 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6582M |
Spreadtrum SC9830 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 433 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6582M is 7% better than Spreadtrum SC9830 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6582M has 2 more core than Spreadtrum SC9830. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 17 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.3 | 1.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.4 | 7.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 8.9 | 3.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 6.2 | 3.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.9 | 5.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.1 | 9.7 | Real Racing 3 | 11.1 | 4.9 | Sniper 3D | 19.6 | 6.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 16 | 6.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 12.9 | 6.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 12.5 | 5.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 5 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6582M is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830 is better: 5 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6582M and Spreadtrum SC9830, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6582M SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
Spreadtrum SC9830 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|