Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 304 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3475 or Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Snapdragon 210 MSM8909

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

26%

Snapdragon 210 MSM8909

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3475

Snapdragon 210 MSM8909

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
Total score	22019	17414
CPU	6174	4876
GPU	8364	6623
MEM	3526	2785
UX	3956	3134

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
Single-Core	58	46
Multi-Core	269	212

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3475	Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
Frequency	1300 MHz	1100 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR 2/3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	533
Memory bandwidth	7	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is 15% better than Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Adreno 304
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	19.2
# of Cores	2
# of Shader Units		24
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.8	5.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.8	14.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.4	8.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.3	8.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.9	11.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.1	17.5
Real Racing 3	11.8	10.1
Sniper 3D	17.9	13
Need for Speed No Limits	15	13
Mortal Kombat X	15	11.7
CSR Racing 2	12.2	8.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Exynos 3 Quad 3475 and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 3 Quad 3475 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3475 specs and review.

Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 specs and review.