Comparisons 22-05-2022
Detailed testing data of Rockchip RK3566 vs MediaTek Helio A20, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Helio A20.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Helio A20 | 12% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Helio A20 | 42% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Helio A20 | 7% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A20 | | Total score | 64108 | 52293 | | CPU | 5870 | 16751 | | GPU | 6458 | 14536 | | MEM | 3517 | 10970 | | UX | 2943 | 9758 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A20 | | Single-Core | 168 | 135 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 609 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A20 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | LPDDR4(X) ?? 6GB, LPDDR3 ?? 4GB | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 2x LPDDR4(X) ?? 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 ?? 933MHz | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 6 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3566 is 9% better than Helio A20 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | PowerVR GE8300 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 660 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 128.75 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 16.9 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 43.1 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 29.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 25.2 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 36.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 54.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 51.5 | | Sniper 3D | | 38.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 47 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 47 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 35.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A20 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Allwinner A133 Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300
|
