Comparisons 22-05-2022 Full testing data of Rockchip RK3566 vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797), comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Helio X20 (MT6797).
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | 19% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | 27% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | 17% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | Total score | 64108 | 83288 | CPU | 5870 | 27213 | GPU | 6458 | 23011 | MEM | 3517 | 17710 | UX | 2943 | 15479 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | Single-Core | 168 | 215 | Multi-Core | 503 | 970 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio X20 (MT6797) | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 4 | 10 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 12.8 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X20 (MT6797) is 4% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 6 more core than Helio X20 (MT6797). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 780 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 106 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 16.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 29.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 17.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 13.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 16.7 | Real Racing 3 | | 36.4 | Sniper 3D | | 46.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 52.4 | Mortal Kombat X | | 37.8 | CSR Racing 2 | | 40.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GeekBench 5 mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Unisoc Tiger T606 Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • MediaTek Helio G37 Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
|