Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of Rockchip RK3566 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Neocore, and how good the SoCs are in games Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Snapdragon 632.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Snapdragon 632 | 21% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Snapdragon 632 | 56% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Snapdragon 632 | 15% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Snapdragon 632 | | Total score | 64108 | 93355 | | CPU | 5870 | 27792 | | GPU | 6458 | 34730 | | MEM | 3517 | 16008 | | UX | 2943 | 14548 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Snapdragon 632 | | Single-Core | 168 | 241 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 1087 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Snapdragon 632 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 7.46 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3566 is 9% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 4 more core than Snapdragon 632. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Adreno 506 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 130 | | # of Cores | 2 | | | # of Shader Units | | 96 | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 18.6 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 33.2 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 20.7 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 15.8 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 19.2 | | Real Racing 3 | | 41.5 | | Sniper 3D | | 43.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 39.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 43.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 39.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Unisoc Tiger T616 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
|
