Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of Rockchip RK3566 vs MediaTek Helio A25, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Helio A25.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Helio A25 | 22% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Helio A25 | 56% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Helio A25 | 16% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A25 | | Total score | 64108 | 95484 | | CPU | 5870 | 30828 | | GPU | 6458 | 26301 | | MEM | 3517 | 20264 | | UX | 2943 | 17865 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A25 | | Single-Core | 168 | 247 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 1112 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio A25 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4GB Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 2x LPDDR4(X) ?? 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 ?? 933MHz | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 14 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3566 is 9% better than Helio A25 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 4 more core than Helio A25. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | PowerVR GE8320 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 126.8 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 20.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 35.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 22.8 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 17.8 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 21.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 62 | | Sniper 3D | | 56.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 63.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 51.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 46 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A25 is better: 22
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Unisoc Tiger T616 Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
