Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Rockchip RK3566 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Rockchip RK3566

Comparisons   17-02-2023
   Full comparison data of Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Rockchip RK3566, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy QCS8250 or Rockchip RK3566.


 
Qualcomm QCS8250
Rockchip RK3566

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
QCS825049% Rockchip RK35664%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
QCS825077% Rockchip RK356648%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
QCS825048% Rockchip RK35661%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
QCS8250 Rockchip RK3566
Total score68305064108
CPU19126217946
GPU25954824359
MEM10928510248
UX12295611530

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
QCS8250 Rockchip RK3566
Single-Core1073168
Multi-Core3756503

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
QCS8250 Rockchip RK3566
Frequency2850 MHz2000 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.85 GHz Kryo 585 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)10 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4xLPDDR3, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory16 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency2750667
Memory bandwidth4416
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS8250 is 29% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCS8250 has -4 more core than Rockchip RK3566. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G52 2EEMC2
GPU Frequency645 MHz820 MHz
GFloPS1348404
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units512
Display3840 x 2160 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)82.713.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra49.223.9
Call of Duty: Mobile44.415.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)69.611.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition101.514.5
Real Racing 386.529.2
Sniper 3D64.930.4
Need for Speed No Limits59.237.8
Mortal Kombat X65.330.1
CSR Racing 260.932.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution64 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS6060
Video Encoding resolution8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed7500 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed3000 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSSGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS8250 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 5
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS8250 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Rockchip RK3566 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


QCS8250 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Apple A11 Bionic
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Apple A10 Fusion
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080


Rockchip RK3566 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands