Comparisons 22-05-2022
Detailed comparison data of Rockchip RK3566 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T), examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Helio P25 (MT6757T).
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 15% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 40% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 10% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | | Total score | 64108 | 63651 | | CPU | 5870 | 20558 | | GPU | 6458 | 17907 | | MEM | 3517 | 13371 | | UX | 2943 | 11548 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | | Single-Core | 168 | 164 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 741 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 16 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | LPDDR4(X) ?? 6GB, LPDDR3 ?? 4GB | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 2x LPDDR4(X) ?? 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 ?? 933MHz | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 14 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 (MT6757T) is 23% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 4 more core than Helio P25 (MT6757T). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-T880 MP2 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 1000 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 68 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 12.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 22.1 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 14.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 10.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 13.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 27.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 48.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 30.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 25.4 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 24.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) is better: 25
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Exynos 7 7904 Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Tiger T310 Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Kirin 955 Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
|
