Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of Rockchip RK3566 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench 5, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, and how good the chipsets are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Atom x5-Z8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 15% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 60% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 12% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | | Total score | 64108 | 62268 | | CPU | 5870 | 18713 | | GPU | 6458 | 20387 | | MEM | 3517 | 11514 | | UX | 2943 | 10003 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | | Single-Core | 168 | 161 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 725 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1440 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.44-1.84 GHz SoFIA | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 2 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 6 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3566 is 28% better than Atom x5-Z8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 500 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 96 | | # of Cores | 2 | 16 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 13.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 22.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 14.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 10.5 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 14.9 | | Real Racing 3 | | 40.1 | | Sniper 3D | | 36.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 41.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 36.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 29.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | A-GOLD 620 | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is better: 20
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300
• Helio P40 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Exynos 850 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• MediaTek Helio G35 Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300
• Exynos 7 7904 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Tiger T310 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Kirin 955 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Helio G25 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Kirin 950 Vs Atom x5-Z8300
|
