Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of Rockchip RK3566 vs MediaTek MT6595, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or MT6595.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
MT6595 | 12% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
MT6595 | 40% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
MT6595 | 10% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
MT6595 | | Total score | 64108 | 50568 | | CPU | 5870 | 16487 | | GPU | 6458 | 14040 | | MEM | 3517 | 10481 | | UX | 2943 | 9266 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
MT6595 | | Single-Core | 168 | 130 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 589 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
MT6595 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 32 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 667 | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 6 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 9% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 4 more core than MT6595. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | PowerVR G6200 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 76.8 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 16.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 42.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 28.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 25.9 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 35.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 53.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 49.5 | | Sniper 3D | | 53.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 50.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 45.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 31.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 22
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Allwinner A133 Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
|
