MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8127

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8127, comparison of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8127 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT8765B or MT8127 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

MT8127

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

MT8127

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

MT8127

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	MT8127
Total score	26283	26416
CPU	7350	7397
GPU	9989	10031
MEM	4212	4217
UX	4721	4748

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	MT8127
Single-Core	69	70
Multi-Core	321	322

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	MT8127
Frequency	1280 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8127 is 1% better than MT8765B in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	35.77
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	4.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	10.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	10.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	14.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	24.3
Real Racing 3	17.2	21.2
Sniper 3D	15.7	20.1
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	17
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	13.8
CSR Racing 2	10.8	13.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8127 is better: 23
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

MT8127 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8127 specs and review.