MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT8765B

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT8765B, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-T720 MP2.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, Octane V2, PCMark, AnTuTu, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy MT6737H or MT8765B and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6737H

MT8765B

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6737H

30%

MT8765B

32%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6737H

MT8765B

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6737H	MT8765B
Total score	23870	26283
CPU	6687	7350
GPU	9070	9989
MEM	3827	4212
UX	4301	4721

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6737H	MT8765B
Single-Core	63	69
Multi-Core	291	321

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6737H	MT8765B
Frequency	1250 MHz	1280 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2, LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	640	800
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8765B is 2% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	450 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	7.65	17
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.4	3.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.1	17.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	12.9	9.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.5	9.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	13.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.1	23.8
Real Racing 3	16.1	17.2
Sniper 3D	20.6	15.7
Need for Speed No Limits	23.2	15.7
Mortal Kombat X	14.8	14.2
CSR Racing 2	18.1	10.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	MPEG-4	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6737H and MT8765B, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737H specs and review.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.