MediaTek MT8765B vs Unisoc SC9832E

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8765B vs Unisoc SC9832E, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T820.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and SC9832E is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Vellamo, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the chips are in games Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MT8765B or SC9832E and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

SC9832E

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

SC9832E

32%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

SC9832E

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	SC9832E
Total score	26283	38067
CPU	7350	10664
GPU	9989	14464
MEM	4212	6088
UX	4721	6855

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	SC9832E
Single-Core	69	101
Multi-Core	321	465

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	SC9832E
Frequency	1280 MHz	1400 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	3 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	933
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here SC9832E is 8% better than MT8765B in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T820
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	10.2
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1440 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	11.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	30.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	19.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	16.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	25.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	38.4
Real Racing 3	17.2	29.7
Sniper 3D	15.7	37.6
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	23.8
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	31.7
CSR Racing 2	10.8	21.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE-4
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9832E is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT8765B and SC9832E, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

SC9832E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• SC9832E specs and review.