MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT6737V

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT6737V, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737V is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Neocore, Octane V2, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MT8765B or MT6737V and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

MT6737V

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

MT6737V

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

MT6737V

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	MT6737V
Total score	26283	26522
CPU	7350	7426
GPU	9989	10086
MEM	4212	4242
UX	4721	4775

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	MT6737V
Single-Core	69	70
Multi-Core	321	324

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	MT6737V
Frequency	1280 MHz	1250 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	640
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8765B is 2% better than MT6737V in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	5.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	19.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	11.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	11.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	15.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	25.2
Real Racing 3	17.2	14.6
Sniper 3D	15.7	22.2
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	21.1
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	18.7
CSR Racing 2	10.8	12.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737V is better: 19
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

MT6737V SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737V specs and review.