MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8783

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8783, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP3 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8783 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT8765B or MT8783 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

MT8783

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

MT8783

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

MT8783

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	MT8783
Total score	26283	29291
CPU	7350	8194
GPU	9989	11135
MEM	4212	4686
UX	4721	5273

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	MT8783
Single-Core	69	77
Multi-Core	321	358

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	MT8783
Frequency	1280 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8783 is 1% better than MT8765B in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8765B has 4 more core than MT8783. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP3
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	17	35.7
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	8.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	22.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	14.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	13.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	18.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	29.6
Real Racing 3	17.2	22.2
Sniper 3D	15.7	32.6
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	26.6
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	17
CSR Racing 2	10.8	19.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8783 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT8765B and MT8783, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

MT8783 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8783 specs and review.