MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8765B vs MediaTek MT8735M, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT8765B or MT8735M and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

MT8735M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

MT8735M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

MT8735M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	MT8735M
Total score	26283	21256
CPU	7350	5948
GPU	9989	8084
MEM	4212	3404
UX	4721	3827

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	MT8735M
Single-Core	69	56
Multi-Core	321	259

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	MT8735M
Frequency	1280 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	533
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8765B is 21% better than MT8735M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	17	17
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1024 x 600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	6.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	17.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	11.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	9.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	13.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	21.2
Real Racing 3	17.2	22.8
Sniper 3D	15.7	25.1
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	18.2
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	18.2
CSR Racing 2	10.8	16

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735M is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT8765B and MT8735M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

MT8735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT8735M specs and review.